Avaaz campaigners protest against the proposed Sky deal outside parliament in London during the summer. -AP
Rupert Murdoch's proposed takeover of Sky faces a six-month investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority after the culture secretary said concerns about the £11.7bn deal mean it needs further examination, the Guardian.
Karen Bradley told parliament she was minded to refer the deal to the competition regulator on the grounds of media plurality and on the grounds of commitment to broadcasting standards. A referral on the grounds of media plurality had been expected but the likely prospect of the second referral was a surprise. Shares in Sky fell after the announcement.
The culture secretary's initial view on the deal in June was to refer the deal on media plurality but not broadcasting standards after Ofcom, the media regulator, raised concerns about how dominant the Murdoch family could be in public life if they were allowed to own all of Sky.
However, since then there has been pressure for the takeover to be referred on the grounds of broadcasting standards. The campaign group Avaaz and a group of high-profile MPs led by Ed Miliband had threatened to launch a judicial review if Bradley did not refer the deal to the CMA on broadcasting standards. Bradley said she was minded to refer on broadcasting standards due to concerns about compliance procedures at Fox News and corporative governance at the Murdochs companies. 21st Century Fox wants to buy the 61% of Sky it does not already own. Fox is controlled by Rupert Murdoch and his sons Lachlan and James.
we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven't put up a paywall - we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help.
The Guardian's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters - because it might well be your perspective, too. 'I appreciate there not being a paywall, it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few.
I'm happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information.' If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.
Leave Your Comments