Published:  11:01 PM, 09 September 2019

Years later, cancer cases linger over 9/11 anniversary

Years later, cancer cases linger over 9/11 anniversary
Jacquelin Febrillet was 26 years old on
September 11, 2001 when jihadist hijackers flew two passenger jets into the
World Trade Center just two blocks from where she worked.

Fifteen years after the attacks that day, Febrillet, by then a mother of
three, was diagnosed with metastatic cancer. The likely cause: a cloud of
toxic ash that engulfed her.

“I was there (on) 9/11… For years I have been working down there every
day since 9/11. We were never told that something could happen,” she says.

Unlike Febrillet, Richard Fahrer, then 19, wasn’t in the area on 9/11, but
he regularly worked as a land surveyor between 2001 and 2003 in south
Manhattan, where the Twin Towers came crashing down.

Eighteen months ago, the young father, now 37, was diagnosed with
aggressive colon cancer — a disease that usually affects older men and which
there is no history of in his family.

Febrillet and Fahrer represent a growing category of patient who were
living or working close to the World Trade Center in the wake of the attacks,
which killed almost 3,000 people.

They were not among the thousands of emergency personnel who rushed to the
site or who spent months clearing debris at Ground Zero, but their health is
being similarly affected.

As the 18th anniversary of the attacks approaches, New York continues to
count the number of people who have developed cancer or other serious
illnesses related to the toxic cloud that hovered over Manhattan for several
weeks.

– ‘People are dying’ –

The 9/11 attacks released unprecedented amounts of chemicals into the air,
including dioxins, asbestos and other carcinogenic substances.

Firefighters, other first responders and volunteers who helped with the
months-long clean-up were the first to be affected. Studies found they faced
an increased risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease.

Ten thousand of them have been diagnosed with cancer by the World Trade
Center Health Program, a federal treatment program helping survivors.

At the end of June this year, 21,000 people not considered first responders
were also in the program — twice as many as in June 2016. Of these, almost
4,000 have cancer, the most common being prostate, breast and skin.

Febrillet, now 44, is one of them. She recalls that the message at the time
was to get the city back to normal as quickly as possible.

“People were just going about their business a few days later. But look at
what happened a few years later, people are dying,” says Febrillet, who also
lived close to Ground Zero.

Fahrer, too, laments that city officials did not do more to protect
residents and office staff in the vicinity.

“My wife asks me, ‘Did terrorists cause your cancer?’ I can’t say 100
percent, but I do know there could have been better efforts to limit the
exposure of healthy adults from entering into the disaster area,” he says.

– Compensation fund –

Health experts say it is impossible to pinpoint exactly the cause of cancer
in every patient, but note that there is a clear correlation between the rate
and exposure to toxic debris.

Several studies have shown that the cancer rate “has increased between 10
and 30 percent” among people who were exposed compared to those who weren’t,
David Prezant, New York fire department chief medical officer, told AFP.

The rate is expected to increase further, he said, as exposed people get
older. The risk of cancer increases with age and some cancers, including
lung, can take 20 to 30 years to develop, Prezant added.

It is because of this that President Donald Trump signed a bill in July
that extends a deadline for victims to file claims for compensation from
December 2020 to 2090.

The Victim Compensation Fund will be regularly topped up after exhausting
its initial budget of $7.3 billion. The average compensation per patient is
$240,000, or $682,000 for a deceased person.

Lawyer Matthew Baione, who represents Fahrer and Febrillet in their pursuit
of claims, said the extension recognized that it was appropriate to cover
someone “who was a baby during the attacks for the rest of their life.”

“We have lost so many people, so many friends are sick,” says Febrillet

“You get to a point where you are not asking, ‘Have you seen so and so, I
wonder how she is doing, is she retired?’

“Instead you are asking, ‘So how is the surgery, how is the treatment
going?’ We are so young, this shouldn’t be happening.”


Leave Your Comments



Latest News


More From World

Go to Home Page »

Site Index The Asian Age