Published:  02:04 AM, 15 February 2020

Voting on your phone: New elections app ignites security debate

Voting on your phone: New elections app ignites security debate

For more than a decade, it has been an elusive dream for election officials: a smartphone app that would let swaths of voters cast their ballots from their living rooms. It has also been a nightmare for cyberexperts, who argue that no technology is secure enough to trust with the very basis of American democracy.

The debate, long a sideshow at academic conferences and state election offices, is now taking on new urgency. A startup called Voatz says it has developed an app that would allow users to vote securely from anywhere in the world - the electoral version of a moonshot. Thousands are set to use the app in this year's elections, a small but growing experiment that could pave the way for a wider acceptance of mobile voting. Reports The New York Times.

But where optimists see a more engaged electorate, critics are warning that the move is dangerously irresponsible. In a new report shared with The New York Times before its publication Thursday, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology say the app is so riddled with security issues that no one should be using it.

In response to the report, the Department of Homeland Security organised a series of briefings in recent weeks for state and local officials who are planning to use Voatz's technology.

"The choice here is not about turnout," the report says, "but about an adversary controlling the election result and a loss of voter privacy." With security already a dominant theme of the 2020 elections, last week's debacle at the Democratic caucuses in Iowa - an app used to report results failed to, well, report results - has raised new questions about the role technology should play in American elections and prompted calls for it to be scaled back.

While a return to the analog days of punch cards and hanging chads is unlikely, there is growing unease about how far state and local governments should go in modernising election infrastructure - from registration databases and electronic poll books to the voting machines themselves. At the far edge of that debate are systems that let users cast their ballots over the internet, including the platform built by Voatz, the only voting app on the market.

An initial experiment with wide-scale online voting took place in Washington a decade ago. It was called off after researchers hacked into the system, electing HAL 9000 - the computer from "2001: A Space Odyssey" - as mayor and making the University of Michigan fight song play every time a ballot was cast.

Since then, some states have allowed online voting through web portals, emails or digital faxes, despite the security risks. But they have restricted it to groups of people who cannot make it to the polls, mostly overseas military personnel.

Voatz says its technology has overcome the security problems through biometrics and other measures built into newer smartphones, as well as a back-end system that records and stores votes on a blockchain, the technology underpinning Bitcoin. It also says its platform creates a paper trail for election officials and the voters using the app.

Since its debut in 2018, Voatz has run several pilot projects aimed largely at deployed service members, tallying about 600 votes across federal elections in Denver, West Virginia and five counties in Oregon, Utah and Washington state. Now, it is poised to expand its reach in the presidential election as a number of additional states consider whether to use it for some categories of absentee voters.

West Virginia, for instance, is planning to use the app to meet new requirements that it find a way to make sure the disabled and infirm can participate, a move that is likely to add thousands of voters this year. Until now, security experts have focused criticism on what they described as Voatz's opaque systems, which make it impossible to verify its security claims.

Beneath that criticism, there is also some very real animus - many in the tightly knit cybersecurity community blame Voatz for helping spur an FBI investigation of a University of Michigan graduate student who tried to breach the company's systems in 2018. The student says he was conducting research.


Leave Your Comments



Latest News


More From Digital Age

Go to Home Page »

Site Index The Asian Age