Published: 12:37 AM, 09 July 2026
Rationality of Admission Tests for Tertiary Education Comes Under Debate
The system of admission tests for tertiary education in Bangladesh has once again become the subject of widespread debate. Students, parents, educators, and policymakers are questioning whether the existing examination-based admission process is the most effective and fair method of selecting candidates for universities and other higher educational institutions. The discussion has gained momentum as competition for limited seats continues to intensify every year.
At present, public universities in Bangladesh conduct admission tests to assess the academic ability of applicants. Although students have already passed the Secondary School Certificate (SSC) and Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) examinations, they are required to sit for separate university entrance tests. Supporters of this system argue that board examination results alone cannot accurately measure a student's knowledge, aptitude, or readiness for higher education. They believe that admission tests ensure merit-based selection and help universities identify the most capable candidates.
However, critics claim that the current system places enormous pressure on students. After completing two major public examinations, candidates must spend months preparing for highly competitive admission tests. Many students rely on expensive coaching centres, creating financial burdens for families and widening the gap between privileged and underprivileged learners. As a result, critics argue that admission tests often reflect access to coaching rather than genuine academic potential.
Another concern is the inconsistency among admission procedures. Different universities follow different question patterns, syllabuses, and marking systems. Students applying to several institutions must prepare for multiple examinations, increasing both stress and costs. Although some universities have introduced cluster admission systems to reduce these difficulties, many believe that a more unified national approach could make the process more efficient and student-friendly.
Education experts have proposed several alternatives. Some recommend giving greater importance to SSC and HSC results, combined with aptitude assessments and interviews where appropriate. Others suggest introducing a standardized national university admission test that would allow students to apply to multiple institutions using a single score. Such a system could reduce the number of examinations while maintaining academic standards and ensuring transparency.
Nevertheless, opponents of eliminating admission tests warn that relying solely on public examination results may not be fair because grading standards can vary across education boards and institutions. They also point out that incidents of question paper leaks and grade inflation in previous years have raised concerns about the reliability of board examination results. Therefore, many believe that an independent admission test remains necessary to ensure equal opportunities for all applicants.
Educationists emphasize that any reform should prioritize fairness, transparency, and equal access. Improving the quality of school education, strengthening public examinations, and reducing dependence on private coaching are considered essential steps toward a more balanced admission system. Digital technologies and centralized application processes can also help simplify admissions and reduce administrative challenges.
As Bangladesh strives to build a skilled and knowledgeable workforce, the debate over the rationality of admission tests is likely to continue. A balanced policy that combines merit, accessibility, and transparency may offer the best solution. Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that every deserving student receives a fair opportunity to pursue higher education and contribute to the country's future development.
Nasir Uddin Shah is Chief
Reporter at The Asian Age.
